Emergency contraception - A review.

Emergency contraception (EC), or postcoital contraception, is a therapy aimed at preventing unintended pregnancy after an act of unprotected or under-protected sexual intercourse. Options include both emergency contraceptive pills (most commonly containing levonorgestrel or ulipristal acetate) and insertion of an intrauterine device. The aim of this paper is to summarize current evidence surrounding the use of emergency contraceptives and to present an evidence-based approach to EC provision. Emergency contraception is a safe and effective option in preventing unwanted pregnancy, irrespective of age, weight, or breastfeeding status. Efforts should be made to increase their availability, as well as knowledge of these methods, both among patients and healthcare providers.

Effects of long-term intermittent pharmacological therapy with ulipristal acetate on reducing the volume of uterine fibroids and relieving symptoms.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a 12-week course and four repeated 12-week courses of daily 5 mg ulipristal acetate (UPA) on reducing the volume and relieving symptoms of uterine fibroids. METHODS: From 2016 to 2019, 287 female patients with uterine fibroids diagnosed using ultrasonography were recruited. The patients received four 12-week course treatments of daily UPA administration in the first and fourth sessions, respectively. During the first and fourth courses of UPA, we measured the volume of the fibroids using ultrasonography to study the effect on volume reduction. The measured outcomes included symptomatic relief and adverse effects. RESULTS: After the first UPA treatment course, menorrhagia was improved in 82.2% of patients. A total of 59.5% of patients were responsive to treatment, and the volume of the three largest fibroids decreased from 160.9 cm3 to 104.6 cm3. After the fourth treatment course, 87.4% of patients reported decreased bleeding. A total of 67.2% of patients were responsive to treatment, and the volume of the three largest fibroids decreased from 171.7 cm3 to 106.5 cm3. In 64 (38.1%) patients in group A and 36 (30.3%) in group B, the fibroid volume increased. Among them, 72% of patients showed improved symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Uterine bleeding, pain, and reduced fibroid volume were adequately regulated in patients with symptomatic fibroids with four repeated 12-week courses of daily UPA.

Society of Family Planning Clinical Recommendation: Emergency contraception.

Emergency contraception (EC) refers to several contraceptive options that can be used within a few days after unprotected or under protected intercourse or sexual assault to reduce the risk of pregnancy. Current EC options available in the United States include the copper intrauterine device (IUD), levonorgestrel (LNG) 52 mg IUD, oral LNG (such as Plan B One-Step, My Way, Take Action), and oral ulipristal acetate (UPA) (ella). These clinical recommendations review the indications, effectiveness, safety, and side effects of emergency contraceptive methods; considerations for the use of EC by specific patient populations and in specific clinical circumstances and current barriers to emergency contraceptive access. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of LNG IUDs for emergency contraceptive use; address the effects of repeated use of UPA at different times in the same menstrual cycle; assess the impact on ovulation of initiating or reinitiating different regimens of regular hormonal contraception following UPA use; and elucidate effective emergency contraceptive pill options by body mass indices or weight.

Ultrasonographic appearance of the endometrium after saline infusion in women presenting with PRM-associated endometrial changes, due to the use of ulipristal acetate.

Ulipristal acetate (UPA), used for the treatment in women with symptomatic fibroids, is associated with endometrial changes visualised on ultrasound as thickening up to more than 16 mm in approximately 10% of the patients. Is saline infusion sonography (SIS) a good alternative for more invasive techniques, to evaluate the presence of intrauterine pathology? Ten patients, presenting with UPA associated endometrial changes at their follow up ultra-sonographic evaluation, were included. Our study demonstrated that SIS is feasible and painless in patients presenting with UPA associated endometrial changes. The thickened endometrium appears to divide at the midline, making it possible to study both layers separately and exclude any suspected intrauterine pathology. Our findings suggest that SIS may be a first choice, non-invasive, painless technique to provide a proper visualisation to rule out intrauterine pathology when UPA associated endometrial changes are diagnosed after fibroid treatment. This is especially of clinical interest in front of assisted reproductive technology treatment. Invasive techniques can be withheld for patients in whom SIS examination is not contributive.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Reversible endometrial changes after ulipristal acetate (UPA) treatment in patients with symptomatic fibroids have been described. In patients who receive UPA, especially if planned to undergo ART, assessment of potential endometrial pathology is important as such interfere with proper implantation after ART. Consequently, clinicians may consider ruling out intrauterine pathology by invasive examinations such as biopsy or hysteroscopy after visualisation of the thickened endometrium.What do the results of this study add? Saline infusion sonography (SIS) was feasible and painless in patients presenting with UPA associated endometrial changes.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? SIS may be a first choice, non-invasive, painless technique to provide a proper visualisation to rule out intrauterine pathology when UPA associated endometrial changes are diagnosed after fibroid treatment. This is especially of clinical interest in front of assisted reproductive technology treatment. Invasive techniques can be withheld for patients in whom SIS examination is not contributive in excluding intrauterine pathology.

Evaluation of marketing authorization and clinical implementation of ulipristal acetate for uterine fibroids.

Ulipristal acetate (UPA) is a medical treatment for uterine fibroids and was authorized for surgical pre-treatment in 2012 after the conduct of the PEARL I and II randomized controlled trials and for intermittent treatment after the observational PEARL III and IV trials. However, UPA came into disrepute due to its temporary suspension in 2017 and 2020 because of an apparent association with liver injury. This clinical opinion paper aims to review the process of marketing authorization and implementation of UPA, in order to provide all involved stakeholders with recommendations for the introduction of future drugs. Before marketing authorization, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) states that Phase III registration trials should evaluate relevant outcomes in a representative population, while comparing to gold-standard treatment. This review shows that the representativeness of the study populations in all PEARL trials was limited, surgical outcomes were not evaluated and intermittent treatment was assessed without comparative groups. Implementation into clinical practice was extensive, with 900 000 prescribed treatment cycles in 5 years in Europe and Canada combined. Extremely high costs are involved in developing and evaluating pre-marketing studies in new drugs, influencing trial design and relevance of chosen outcomes, thereby impeding clinical applicability. It is vitally important that the marketing implementation after authorization is regulated in such way that necessary evidence is generated before widespread prescription of a new drug. All stakeholders, from pharmaceutical companies to authorizing bodies, governmental funding bodies and medical professionals should be aware of their role and take responsibility for their part in this process.

Effects of ulipristal acetate in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids. / Efectos del acetato de ulipristal en pacientes con miomas uterinos sintomáticos.

INTRODUCTION: Uterine fibroids are frequently encountered in gynecology and are a therapeutic challenge. New therapies, such as ulipristal acetate, could help with symptomatic relief, improve quality of life, and decrease uterine fibroid size. Notwithstanding, there is controversy about adverse effects, especially for hepatotoxicity. METHODS: We searched in Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis, and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We identified nine systematic reviews and included ten studies overall, of which five were randomized trials. We conclude that ulipristal increases the likelihood of amenorrhea, improves the quality of life, and decreases menstrual bleeding. However, there is also a likely increase in the risk of adverse effects. Furthermore, ulipristal could decrease the size of fibroids.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Los miomas uterinos son una patología frecuente en ginecología, que tiene como desafío el enfrentamiento terapéutico. Existen nuevas terapias como el uso de acetato de ulipristal que podrían ayudar con el alivio sintomático y mejoría de la calidad de vida, además de la disminución del tamaño de los miomas uterinos. No obstante, existe controversia respecto a los efectos adversos, especialmente frente a la hepatotoxicidad. MÉTODOS: Realizamos una búsqueda en Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud, la cual es mantenida mediante el tamizaje de múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Extrajimos los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, analizamos los datos de los estudios primarios, realizamos un metanálisis y preparamos una tabla de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. RESULTADOS Y CONCLUSIONES: Identificamos nueve revisiones sistemáticas que incluyeron diez estudios primarios, de los cuales cinco son ensayos aleatorizados. Concluimos que el uso de ulipristal aumenta la probabilidad de amenorrea, mejora la calidad de vida y disminuye el sangrado menstrual. Además, el uso de ulipristal podría disminuir el tamaño de los miomas. Sin embargo, podría aumentar el riesgo de efectos adversos.

Efficacy of ulipristal acetate in women with fibroid induced menorrhagia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of UPA in women with fibroid induced menorrhagia. METHODS: Embase, MEDLINE, CAB Abstracts, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsychInfo were searched up to 18th May 2020 and updated on 7th February 2021. Randomised controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of UPA in women with fibroid induced menorrhagia were included in the study. RESULTS: Two authors independently reviewed and extracted the study data. Statistical heterogeneity was quantified using I2 statistics. Publication bias and data asymmetry was assessed by funnel plots. A meta-analysis was conducted where appropriate. Six studies were eligible for inclusion. UPA (5 mg and 10 mg) achieved statistically significant amenorrhoeic outcome when compared to placebo (p<0.00001). Increased adverse events (AE) profile was observed in the higher UPA dose, however, did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates the efficacy of UPA in achieving amenorrhoea in women with fibroid induced menorrhagia. However, the favourable dose of UPA remains inconclusive when AE profile is taken into account. Evidence remains obscure regarding liver damage and further research is warranted to attain a conclusive outcome.

Dual agonist-antagonist effect of ulipristal acetate in human endometrium and myometrium.

The aim of this study was to assess the molecular effect of ulipristal acetate (UPA) on gene expression in myometrium and endometrium of patients with symptomatic fibroids. Tissues isolated from four women treated preoperatively with UPA (5 mg) were compared to those from untreated controls using NanoString platform to assess the expression of 75 candidate genes modulated by UPA and ovarian steroids. Deregulated genes were then validated by real-time PCR. In myometrium, UPA exerted an antagonistic effect similar to that observed in fibroids. In UPA-treated endometrium, six genes were identified as highly and significantly upregulated, including matricellular genes CCN1 (54-fold, P = 0.0018) and CCN2 (11-fold, P = 0.00044), Krüppel-like factor 4 (>3-fold, P = 0.0036), and mast cell markers including tryptases TPSAB1/TPSB2 (31-fold, P = 0.023) and carboxypeptidase A (CPA3, 17-fold, P = 0.05). In endometrium, UPA induced the expression of genes involved in fibrogenesis and mast cell function-some of them being widely involved in hepatic injury, which could explain the marked fibrosis and inflammatory cell infiltration observed in explanted livers from patients under UPA treatment.

The endometrial response to modulation of ligand-progesterone receptor pathways is reversible.

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of the progesterone receptor modulator (PRM), ulipristal acetate (UPA), on endometrial morphology and function. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: University Research Institute. PATIENT(S): Endometrial biopsies from 16 patients with heavy menstrual bleeding with a structurally normal uterus or in association with structural abnormalities identified on radiological imaging (fibroids, adenomyosis or a combination of fibroids and adenomyosis). INTERVENTION(S): Participants received UPA (5 mg once daily) for three 12-week courses, each separated by 4 weeks without treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Gene expression by real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry, and digital image analysis were analyzed to investigate the endometrial impact of modulation of progesterone receptor pathways upon expression of steroid receptors, steroid metabolizing enzymes, cell proliferation, and progesterone-regulated genes in the same patients at 3 time points: before, during, and after discontinuation of PRM treatment. RESULT(S): Ulipristal acetate treatment resulted in increased messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) levels of steroid receptors compared with pretreatment secretory endometrium; decreased mRNA levels of 17- and 11-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases compared with pretreatment proliferative endometrium and pretreatment secretory endometrium; reduced cell proliferation compared with pretreatment proliferative endometrium; and altered mRNA levels of progesterone-regulated genes. A strong consistency between immunohistochemistry-digital image analysis and real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction results was evident. Alterations in the mRNA levels and endometrial morphology returned to a pretreatment phenotype after the cessation of PRM exposure. CONCLUSION(S): The endometrial impact of the modulation of progesterone receptor pathways with PRM (UPA) treatment is reversible. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Ulipristal acetate versus conventional management of heavy menstrual bleeding (UCON) trial (EudraCT 2014-003408-65; REC14/LO/1602).

Ulipristal acetate compared with leuprorelin acetate for Japanese women with symptomatic uterine fibroids: a phase III randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ulipristal acetate (UPA) for uterine fibroids (UFs), a phase III study was conducted with leuprorelin (LEU) as a comparator. This is the first confirmatory trial of UPA for UFs among Asians. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. SETTING: Thirty-two sites in Japan. PATIENT(S): Patients were assigned to 2 arms, with 82 patients in the UPA group and 79 patients in the LEU group. INTERVENTION(S): In the UPA group, 10 mg of UPA was orally administered once a day for 12 weeks. In the LEU group, 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg of LEU was subcutaneously administered at weeks 0, 4, and 8. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with amenorrhea for 35 days. For safety evaluation, adverse events (AEs) were recorded. RESULT(S): The percentage of patients with amenorrhea for 35 days was 87.0% in the UPA group and 81.8% in the LEU group, and the efficacy of UPA for causing amenorrhea for 35 days was confirmed to be noninferior to that of LEU. AEs occurred in 78.0% of the patients in the UPA group and 88.8% of the patients in the LEU group. CONCLUSION(S): The effect of UPA on heavy menstrual bleeding was shown to be comparable with that of LEU in Japanese patients with symptomatic UFs. No notable AEs occurred because of the UPA treatment, and the incidence of AEs in the UPA group was comparable with that of AEs in the LEU group. This result demonstrates the clinical utility of UPA for Asians.

Estradiol/nomegestrol acetate as a first-line and rescue therapy for the treatment of ovarian and deep infiltrating endometriosis.

PURPOSE: Estradiol valerate/nomegestrol acetate (E2V/NOMAC) is a new combined oral contraceptive with a good tolerability profile and low drop-out rates, which was shown to improve menstrual-related symptoms. This study aims to evaluate its effectiveness in the control of symptoms and progression of disease in women with ovarian endomestriomas and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study on 39 women with pelvic endometriosis treated with E2V/NOMAC. We assessed for each patient, at the beginning of treatment and after 6 months, the painful symptoms, through a global VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) index and the size of the greatest ovarian and/or deep infiltrating endometriotic lesions. RESULTS: After 6 months of treatment, a significant reduction was observed for the global VAS score for pain symptoms and for the mean size of ovarian endometriomas, whereas DIE lesions did not present significant changes in mean size. CONCLUSIONS: E2/NOMAC was effective in reducing pain symptoms associated with pelvic endometriosis and the size of ovarian endometriomas, whereas DIE lesions remained stable. This therapy could provide good results in the control of symptoms and disease progression in women with pelvic endometriosis.

Use of Ulipristal Acetate and Risk of Liver Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

CONTEXT: Large-scale clinical trials on the hepatotoxicity of ulipristal acetate (UPA) are lacking. OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to determine the incidence of liver disease with UPA vs gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in South Korea of women with uterine fibroids from the Korean Health Insurance Data 2010 to 2018. Women with uterine fibroids were divided into 2 treatment groups: the UPA (5 mg/day) and GnRH agonist groups. Main outcome measures included the presence or absence of severe liver disease, mild liver disease, and liver transplantation. RESULTS: Among the patients with uterine fibroids,17 207 patients were treated with GnRH agonists and 20 926 patients with UPA. After 1:1 propensity score matching for each group, there were 11 445 individuals. Neither group had a liver transplantation case. In the conditional logistic regression analysis, the incidence of total liver diseases (relative risk [RR] 1.111; 95% CI, 1.015-1.216) and mild liver diseases (RR 1.094; 95% CI, 1-1.196) was higher in the UPA group than in the GnRH agonist group, but that of severe liver diseases (RR 0.07; 95% CI, 0.001-4.412) and toxic liver disease (RR 1.256; 95% CI, 0.845-1.867) did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: The incidence of severe liver disease, hepatic failure, and toxic liver disease was not different between the UPA and GnRH agonist groups. However, the incidence of mild liver disease was higher in the UPA group than in the GnRH agonist group. The incidence of hepatic damage with UPA was very low.

[Pharmacovigilance update]. / Pharmacovigilance.

The main pharmacovigilance updates in 2020 are reviewed. Remdesivir in COVID-19: relatively safe but turns out to be less effective than expected. Hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 : lack of efficacy and risk of arrhythmias. Cytokines storm in COVID-19: may impact pharmacokinetics. VEGF inhibitors: risk of aneurysm and artery dissection. Tofacitinib: dose-dependant risk of venous thromboembolic events. Ondansetron in the first trimester of pregnancy : a highly debated risk of orofacial cleft defects. Fingolimod : contraindicated during pregnancy due to suspected risk of congenital malformations. Ranitidine: global market withdrawal due to contamination with nitrosamines. Ulipristal for uterine fibroids : market withdrawal due to risk of severe liver injury. Ingenol mebutate : market withdrawal due to paradoxical risk of skin cancers.

Les principales actualités de pharmacovigilance 2020 sont passées en revue. Remdésivir et Covid-19 : moins efficace qu'attendu mais assez sûr. Hydroxychloroquine et Covid-19 : absence d'efficacité et risque d'arythmies. Orage cytokinique et Covid-19 : impact possible sur les paramètres pharmacocinétiques. Inhibiteurs du VEGF : risque d'anévrisme artériel et de dissection. Tofacitinib : risque d'événements thromboemboliques. Ondansétron au 1er trimestre de grossesse : risque controversé de fentes palatines. Fingolimod : contre-indiqué dans la grossesse pour possible risque malformatif. Ranitidine : retrait du marché mondial pour contamination par des nitrosamines. Ulipristal et fibromyomes utérins : retrait du marché pour risque d'atteinte hépatique grave. Mébutate d'ingénol : retrait du marché pour risque paradoxal de cancers cutanés.

What happens after randomised controlled trials? Uterine fibroids and ulipristal acetate: systematic review and meta-analysis of "real-world" data.

PURPOSE: "Real-world" data incorporates studies performed outside of controlled environments, allowing for a better understanding of the effects of treatment in routine clinical practice. We, therefore, performed a systematic review to summarise available "real-world studies" reporting on the use of ulipristal acetate (UPA) for management of uterine fibroids. METHODS: We designed a prospective protocol according to PRISMA guidelines and registered it with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42019151393). We searched all major databases for relevant citations until 20th September 2019. Our screen included studies for risk of bias using an adapted structured quality assessment tool. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate proportion estimates for each outcome including 95% confidence interval. Reported heterogeneity was assessed using I2. RESULTS: Initial search yielded 755 studies and 13 were included in the final synthesis. Administration of UPA resulted in reduction in the size of fibroids in 56.5% of women, improved menorrhagia in 83% of women, improved perception of pain in 80.1% of women and lead to an improvement in global symptom scores in 85.2% of women. Mean reduction in surgical blood loss and surgical time with use of UPA was 59.85 ml and 12.47 min, respectively. Qualitative analysis suggested that there was no difference in overall surgical experience for patients treated with UPA compared to those without pre-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are consistent with previously reported data that UPA is an acceptable management option for women with fibroids. However, it provides limited benefits when used as a pre-operative adjunct, in terms of blood loss and surgical time.

Ulipristal acetate use in adenomyosis: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a 10 mg per day 12 week treatment of ulipristal acetate (UPA) on abnormal uterine bleeding due to adenomyosis. DESIGN: A double-blind phase 2 randomized controlled pilot study. SETTING: From May 2015 to February 2018 in five teaching hospitals. POPULATION: Premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding (with a pictorial blood loss assessment score (PBAC) higher than 100 at inclusion) and a sonographic or MRI diagnosis of adenomyosis. METHODS: After random allocation, either UPA 10 mg or placebo were orally administered during 12 weeks. A 3:1 ratio was used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the rate of women with a PBAC score of less than 75 as evaluated over the 28 days following the 12-week treatment. Secondary outcomes included rate of amenorrhea, evolution of pain, quality of life and tolerance. RESULTS: Thirty women were included in the UPA group and 10 in the placebo group. No woman in the placebo group versus 95.24 % of women in the UPA group had a PBAC score under 75 during the 28 day period following the 12-week treatment (p < 0.01). A significant decrease in pain was noticed between inclusion and 13 weeks in the UPA group (p < 0.01). At 6 months, there was no significant difference in PBAC score or pain between groups. No serious adverse event was recorded. CONCLUSION: UPA could be an interesting option for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding related to adenomyosis in women wishing to preserve their fertility.

Medical Therapy for Fibroids: What Next for Ulipristal Acetate?

Ulipristal acetate (UPA) was introduced as a novel progesterone receptor modulator as effective therapy for symptomatic fibroids. Randomised clinical trials established its effectiveness in the management of heavy menstrual bleeding due to uterine leiomyomas. The trials did not find any significant evidence of clinical harm to the participants. Recently, however, there have been reports of liver injury necessitating liver transplant in women who have had UPA treatment. This has led to the suspension of UPA as one of the medical therapies in the treatment for uterine fibroids while the European Medicines Agency (EMA) conducts a review of liver injury risk with its use. The European Medicine Agency safety committee has advised that women should stop taking 5 mg UPA and that no new patients should commence treatment with the medicine until the ongoing review is completed. In this article, we review the rise of UPA as one of the emerging medical therapies for symptomatic uterine fibroids and the subsequent reports of adverse events leading to the suspension of its use.

Ulipristal Acetate for Treatment of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder: A Proof-of-Concept Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is a common mood disorder, characterized by distressing affective, behavioral, and somatic symptoms in the late luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. The authors investigated continuous treatment with a selective progesterone receptor modulator, ulipristal acetate (UPA), as a potential treatment for PMDD. METHODS: The authors conducted an investigator-initiated, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial in which women with PMDD (N=95) were treated with either 5 mg/day of UPA or placebo during three 28-day treatment cycles. The primary outcome was the change in premenstrual total score on the Daily Record of Severity of Problems (DRSP) from baseline to end of treatment. DRSP scores were captured by daily ratings using a smartphone application and were analyzed with linear mixed models for repeated measures. RESULTS: The mean improvement in DRSP score after 3 months was 41% (SD=18) in the UPA group, compared with 22% (SD=27) in the placebo group (mean difference -18%; 95% CI=-29, -8). Treatment effects were also noted for the DRSP depressive symptom subscale (42% [SD=22] compared with 22% [SD=32]) and the DRSP anger/irritability subscale (47% [SD=21] compared with 23% [SD=35]), but not for the DRSP physical symptom subscale. Remission based on DRSP score was attained by 20 women in the UPA group (50.0%) and eight women in the placebo group (21.1%) (a statistically significant difference). CONCLUSIONS: If these results are replicated, UPA could be a useful treatment for PMDD, particularly for the psychological symptoms associated with the disorder.

Treatment Choices in a National Cohort of Canadian Women With Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids.

OBJECTIVES: To describe treatment choices made at the time of enrollment in CAPTURE, a Canadian patient registry for women with symptomatic uterine fibroids (UFs), and to define demographic and clinical characteristics that independently predict these choices. METHODS: Women arranging appointments for UF care were eligible to enrol. At the time of the enrollment visit, women's self-reported treatment histories were noted, along with their clinical characteristics. Tretment options were discussed and chosen during that visit. Patients could choose medical and/or surgical treatment, or they could opt for no active treatment (i.e., "watchful waiting"); treatment decisions were not binding. RESULTS: The most common medication proposed and chosen was ulipristal acetate (UPA), and the most common procedure was myomectomy. These treatments were also the most commonly identified in patients' histories. Medication alone and medication in combination with surgery were the most common treatment approaches chosen (46% and 26%, respectively). Surgery alone and watchful waiting were chosen by 14% and 13% of patients, respectively. Significant predictors of active treatment included patient pregnancy plans, overall symptom severity, and prior treatment history (medical and surgical). Other parameters, including patient age and history of specific UF symptoms, appear to influence the choice of medical therapies (UPA, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, or other options) and procedures (myomectomy or hysterectomy). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study documents the patient factors associated with the treatment decisions of women seeking care for symptomatic UFs in contemporary Canadian gynaecology practice. Subsequent analyses will follow the outcomes of these treatments over two years in this population.

Management of symptomatic uterine fibroids with ulipristal acetate: A retrospective, multicentric and nationwide study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate symptomatic uterine fibroid outcomes following at least one course of ulipristal acetate (UPA) 5 mg/day therapy in the hospital setting, during the year 2017. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective and descriptive analysis involving women with symptomatic fibroids was conducted in 15 hospital centers in Portugal in 2017 to assess fibroid size, bleeding control and hemoglobin levels following at least one course of UPA 5 mg/day. Secondary outcomes were the reasons for the treatment, type of surgery, fibroid classification, patient satisfaction with the treatment, and adverse events. RESULTS: Five-hundred and twenty-six patients were enrolled in this survey, and 93 % of the women completed, at least, 1 treatment course with UPA. Uterine bleeding control was achieved in 81 % of the cases. A significant increase (p < 0.001) in hemoglobin levels and a reduction (p < 0.001) in uterine fibroid size was observed after treatment, with a median reduction of 24 % from the baseline. Forty-seven percent of the patients underwent subsequent surgery and there were no serious adverse events reported in this multicentric nationwide study. CONCLUSIONS: So far, this is the largest case series reporting on symptomatic uterine fibroid outcomes after UPA therapy in Portugal. Our data are in line with published literature and confirm favorable outcomes after UPA therapy for women of childbearing age and premenopausal.